Initial TrueGrowth source import

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-07 09:36:36 +08:00
commit 3b6781d695
2283 changed files with 691996 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
# Specification Quality Checklist: 对话抽屉 (Chat Drawer)
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2025-12-03
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
## Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
## Validation Results
**All validation items passed**
### Validation Details:
**Content Quality**:
- Specification is written in user-centric language without technical implementation details
- Focuses on what users need (dialogue drawer, conversation history, session management)
- Business stakeholders can understand the feature requirements
- All mandatory sections (User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria) are complete
**Requirement Completeness**:
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers present - all requirements are specific and clear
- All 16 functional requirements are testable (e.g., FR-001: drawer can be expanded/collapsed)
- Success criteria include measurable metrics (SC-001: 1 second to expand, SC-002: 3 second response time)
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no mention of React, API endpoints, etc.)
- Four user stories with detailed acceptance scenarios covering all primary flows
- Six edge cases identified (network failure, long history, rapid messages, etc.)
- Scope is clearly defined through user stories P1-P4
- Key entities defined (ChatSession, ChatMessage, DrawerState)
**Feature Readiness**:
- Each functional requirement maps to user story acceptance criteria
- User stories cover drawer interaction (P1), persistence (P2), session management (P3), and operations (P4)
- Success criteria provide measurable outcomes for all critical paths
- Specification maintains abstraction - no React components, API routes, or data structures mentioned
## Notes
Specification is ready for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`). No updates required.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
# UX Requirements Quality Checklist: 对话抽屉 (Chat Drawer)
**Purpose**: Validate completeness, clarity, and consistency of UX requirements for chat drawer UI components
**Created**: 2025-12-03
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
**Focus**: UI Components, Interactions, Visual Design, Accessibility
---
## Requirement Completeness
- [ ] CHK001 - Are all UI component requirements documented for the chat drawer (drawer container, trigger button, message list, input area, session list)? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001,002,003]
- [ ] CHK002 - Are visual specifications defined for distinguishing user messages vs AI messages? [Completeness, Spec §FR-002]
- [ ] CHK003 - Are loading state visual requirements defined for AI response generation? [Completeness, Spec §FR-005]
- [ ] CHK004 - Are attachment preview UI requirements specified (thumbnail, file type icon, remove button)? [Gap, Spec §FR-015]
- [ ] CHK005 - Are session list item UI requirements defined (title truncation, timestamp format, delete button)? [Gap, Spec §FR-009]
- [ ] CHK006 - Are empty state requirements defined for new sessions with no messages? [Gap]
---
## Requirement Clarity
- [ ] CHK007 - Is "抽屉宽度自适应" quantified with specific values (30% viewport, 320-500px)? [Clarity, Spec §FR-018] ✓
- [ ] CHK008 - Is the drawer expand/collapse animation duration specified in milliseconds? [Clarity, Spec §FR-012]
- [ ] CHK009 - Are exact icon specifications defined (paper clip for attachments, pause button)? [Clarity, Spec §FR-015,016]
- [ ] CHK010 - Is "流畅自然" animation quantified with specific easing curve and duration? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-012]
- [ ] CHK011 - Is the "正在理解需求并梳理您提供的材料" loading text a requirement or example? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-005]
- [ ] CHK012 - Are session title truncation rules clearly specified (30 characters mentioned in entity)? [Clarity, Spec §Key Entities]
---
## Requirement Consistency
- [ ] CHK013 - Are drawer width requirements consistent between FR-018 (30%, 320-500px) and DrawerState entity definition? [Consistency]
- [ ] CHK014 - Are message status visual indicators consistently defined across MessageItem and MessageList? [Consistency]
- [ ] CHK015 - Are icon styles consistent with existing TDesign component library patterns? [Consistency, Constitution §IV]
- [ ] CHK016 - Are responsive breakpoint definitions consistent with existing application patterns? [Consistency]
---
## Acceptance Criteria Quality
- [ ] CHK017 - Can SC-001 "1秒内展开/收起" be objectively measured with existing tools? [Measurability, Spec §SC-001]
- [ ] CHK018 - Can SC-004 "60fps动画" be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §SC-004]
- [ ] CHK019 - Is SC-005 "90%用户首次使用成功" methodology for measurement defined? [Measurability, Spec §SC-005]
- [ ] CHK020 - Are visual acceptance criteria defined for message status states (sending, streaming, success, failed)? [Measurability]
---
## Scenario Coverage
- [ ] CHK021 - Are requirements defined for all drawer states (collapsed, expanded, loading, error)? [Coverage]
- [ ] CHK022 - Are interaction requirements defined for mobile touch gestures (swipe to close)? [Coverage, Gap]
- [ ] CHK023 - Are requirements defined for very long messages (text wrapping, truncation)? [Coverage, Edge Case]
- [ ] CHK024 - Are requirements defined for very long session lists (50+ sessions)? [Coverage, Edge Case]
- [ ] CHK025 - Are requirements defined for zero-state (first time user, no sessions)? [Coverage, Gap]
---
## Edge Case Coverage
- [ ] CHK026 - Are visual requirements defined for network error states on message send? [Edge Case, Spec §FR-014]
- [ ] CHK027 - Are requirements defined for attachment upload progress indication? [Edge Case, Gap]
- [ ] CHK028 - Are requirements defined for attachment upload failure states? [Edge Case, Gap]
- [ ] CHK029 - Are requirements defined for when drawer cannot expand due to viewport constraints? [Edge Case, Gap]
- [ ] CHK030 - Are requirements defined for rapid consecutive message sends? [Edge Case, Spec §Edge Cases]
---
## Non-Functional Requirements (UX Focus)
### Accessibility
- [ ] CHK031 - Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for drawer open/close? [Accessibility, Gap]
- [ ] CHK032 - Are ARIA attributes requirements specified for drawer component? [Accessibility, Gap]
- [ ] CHK033 - Are focus management requirements defined (focus trap when drawer open)? [Accessibility, Gap]
- [ ] CHK034 - Are screen reader announcement requirements defined for AI response streaming? [Accessibility, Gap]
- [ ] CHK035 - Are color contrast requirements specified for message differentiation? [Accessibility, Gap]
### Responsive Design
- [ ] CHK036 - Is the mobile full-screen overlay behavior completely specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-017]
- [ ] CHK037 - Are breakpoint thresholds for mobile vs desktop defined? [Clarity, Gap]
- [ ] CHK038 - Are touch target size requirements defined for mobile interactions? [Gap]
### Animation & Performance
- [ ] CHK039 - Are animation requirements defined to respect prefers-reduced-motion? [Accessibility, Gap]
- [ ] CHK040 - Are performance requirements for message list rendering with 100+ messages defined? [Performance, Spec §SC-003]
---
## Dependencies & Assumptions
- [ ] CHK041 - Is the assumption that TDesign components will be used validated against existing patterns? [Assumption, Constitution §IV]
- [ ] CHK042 - Are BEM naming conventions for new CSS classes documented? [Dependency, Constitution §IV]
- [ ] CHK043 - Is the dependency on existing icon library documented? [Dependency, Gap]
---
## Ambiguities & Conflicts
- [ ] CHK044 - Is "流畅自然" (smooth and natural) for animations ambiguous? Should specify exact easing/duration [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-012]
- [ ] CHK045 - Is there potential conflict between adaptive drawer width and canvas workspace needs? [Potential Conflict]
- [ ] CHK046 - Are z-index requirements for drawer overlay defined to prevent conflicts with existing UI? [Gap]
---
## Summary
| Category | Items | Critical Gaps |
|----------|-------|---------------|
| Completeness | 6 | Empty states, attachment preview details |
| Clarity | 6 | Animation duration, loading text |
| Consistency | 4 | None identified |
| Acceptance Criteria | 4 | Measurement methodologies |
| Scenario Coverage | 5 | Touch gestures, zero-state |
| Edge Cases | 5 | Attachment upload states |
| Accessibility | 10 | Keyboard nav, ARIA, focus management |
| Dependencies | 3 | Icon library documentation |
| Ambiguities | 3 | Animation specifics, z-index |
**Total Items**: 46
**High Priority Gaps**: Accessibility requirements (CHK031-CHK035, CHK039)